|
Antiphilosophy has been used as a denigrating word〔Bruno Bosteels, "Radical Antiphilosophy," Filozofski vestnik (2008)1, 55-87〕 but recently it has acquired more positive connotations as an opposition to more traditional philosophy.〔Penelope Maddy, "Wittgenstein's Anti-Philosophy of Mathematics", Johannes Czermak and Klaus Paul, eds., ''Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Mathematics'', 1993, http://www.socsci.uci.edu/~pjmaddy/bio/wittgenstein%27s%20anti-philosophy.pdf〕〔Jan Riis Flor, "Den senere Wittgenstein", Poul Lübcke, ed., ''Vor tids filosofi: Videnskab og sprog'', Politikens forlag, 1982〕 The views of Ludwig Wittgenstein, specifically his metaphilosophy, could be said to be antiphilosophy.〔〔http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/03/03/was-wittgenstein-right/, Paul Horwich, "Was Wittgenstein Right?", The New York Times, 2013-03-03〕 Antiphilosophy is anti-theoretical, critical of a priori justifications, and sees philosophical problems as misconceptions that are to be therapeutically dissolved.〔 ==Antiphilosophy and Wittgenstein's metaphilosophy== In 〔 Paul Horwich points to Wittgenstein's rejection of philosophy as traditionally and currently practiced and his "insistence that it can't give us the kind of knowledge generally regarded as its raison d'être". Horwich goes on to argue that: Horwich concludes that, according to Wittgenstein, philosophy "must avoid theory-construction and instead be merely 'therapeutic,' confined to exposing the irrational assumptions on which theory-oriented investigations are based and the irrational conclusions to which they lead". Moreover, these antiphilosophical views are central to Wittgenstein, Horwich argues. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Antiphilosophy」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|