翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Comedy Underground with Dave Attell
・ Comedy Works
・ Comedy Workshop
・ Comedy World Cup
・ Comedy!
・ Comedy's Dirtiest Dozen
・ Comedy-drama
・ Comedy.com
・ ComedyMax
・ Comedyoke
・ ComedySportz
・ Comedystreet
・ Comedytime Saturday
・ Comedytrain
・ Comeesia
COMEFROM
・ ComeFromHeaven
・ Comega Building
・ Comeglians
・ Comelico
・ Comelico Superiore
・ Comella
・ Comella insularis
・ Comella laetifica
・ Comely
・ Comely Bank
・ Comely Park School
・ Comely shiner
・ Comely Stakes
・ Comemoração River


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

COMEFROM : ウィキペディア英語版
COMEFROM

In computer programming, COMEFROM (or COME FROM) is an obscure control flow structure used in some programming languages, originally as a joke. COMEFROM is roughly the opposite of GOTO in that it can take the execution state from any arbitrary point in code to a COMEFROM statement.
The point in code where the state transfer happens is usually given as a parameter to COMEFROM. Whether the transfer happens before or after the instruction at the specified transfer point depends on the language used. Depending on the language used, multiple COMEFROMs referencing the same departure point may be invalid, be non-deterministic, be executed in some sort of defined priority, or even induce parallel or otherwise concurrent execution as seen in Threaded Intercal.
A simple example of a "COMEFROM x" statement is a label x (which does not need to be physically located anywhere near its corresponding COMEFROM) that acts as a "trap door". When code execution reaches the label, control gets passed to the statement following the COMEFROM. This may also be conditional, passing control only if a condition is satisfied, analogous to a GOTO within an IF statement. The primary difference from GOTO is that GOTO only depends on the local structure of the code, while COMEFROM depends on the global structure – a GOTO transfers control when it reaches a line with a GOTO statement, while COMEFROM requires scanning the entire program or scope to see if any COMEFROM statements are in scope for the line, and then verifying if a condition is hit. The effect of this is primarily to make debugging (and understanding the control flow of the program) extremely difficult, since there is no indication near the line or label in question that control will mysteriously jump to another point of the program – one must study the entire program to see if any COMEFROM statements reference that line or label.
Debugger hooks can be used to implement a COMEFROM statement, as in the humorous Python goto module; see below. This also can be implemented with the gcc feature "asm goto" as used by the Linux kernel configuration option CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL. A no-op has its location stored, to be replaced by a jump to an executable fragment that at its end returns to the instruction after the no-op.
==History==
COMEFROM was initially seen in lists of joke assembly language instructions (as 'CMFRM'). It was elaborated upon in a Datamation article by R. Lawrence Clark in 1973,〔.〕 written in response to Edsger Dijkstra's letter ''Go To Statement Considered Harmful''. COMEFROM was eventually implemented in the C-INTERCAL variant of the esoteric programming language INTERCAL along with the even more obscure 'computed COMEFROM'. There were also Fortran proposals for 'assigned COME FROM' and a 'DONT' keyword (to complement the existing 'DO' loop).
On 1 April 2004, Richie Hindle published an implementation of both GOTO and COMEFROM for the Python programming language.〔.〕 Despite being released on April Fools' Day and not being intended for serious use, the syntax is valid and the implementation fully works.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「COMEFROM」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.