|
''Chirostenotes'' ( ; named from Greek 'narrow-handed') is a genus of oviraptorosaurian dinosaur from the late Cretaceous (about 76.5 million years ago) of Alberta, Canada. The type species is ''Chirostenotes pergracilis''. ==Description== ''Chirostenotes'' was characterized by long arms ending in slender relatively straight claws, and long powerful legs with slender toes. In life, the animal was about long. ''Chirostenotes'' was probably an omnivore or herbivore, based on evidence from the beaks of related species like ''Anzu wyliei'' and ''Caenagnathus collinsi''. In 2005 Phil Senter and J. Michael Parrish published a study on the hand function of ''Chirostenotes'' and found that its elongated second finger with its unusually straight claw may have been an adaptation to crevice probing. They suggested that ''Chirostenotes'' may have fed on soft-bodied prey that could be impaled by the second claw, such as grubs, as well as unarmored amphibians, reptiles, and mammals.〔Senter, P.; Parrish, J.M. (2005) Functional analysis of the hands of the theropod dinosaur ''Chirostenotes pergracilis'': evidence for an unusual paleoecological role. ''PaleoBios'' 25: 9–19〕 However, if ''Chirostenotes'' possessed the large primary feathers on its second finger that have been found in other oviraptorosaurs such as ''Caudipteryx'', it would not have been able to engage in such behavior.〔Naish, D. (2007). (Feathers and Filaments of Dinosaurs, Part II ) Tetrapod Zoology, April 23, 2011.〕 ==Taxonomic history== ''Chirostenotes'' has a confusing history of discovery and naming. The first fossils of ''Chirostenotes'', a pair of hands, were in 1914 found by George Fryer Sternberg near Little Sandhill Creek in the Campanian Dinosaur Park Formation of Canada, which has yielded the most dinosaurs of any Canadian formation. The specimens were studied by Lawrence Morris Lambe who, however, died before being able to formally name them. In 1924, Charles Whitney Gilmore adopted the name he found in Lambe's notes and described and named the type species ''Chirostenotes pergracilis''. The generic name is derived from Greek ''cheir'', "hand", and ''stenotes'', "narrowness". The specific name means "throughout", ''per~'', "gracile", ''gracilis'', in Latin. The holotype is NMC 2367, the pair of hands.〔Gilmore, C.W. (1924). A new coelurid dinosaur from the Belly River Cretaceous of Alberta. ''Canada Department of Mines Geological Survey Bulletin (Geological Series)'' 38(43):1-12.〕 Another fossil connected to ''Chirostenotes'' is specimen CMN 8776, a set of jaws with strange teeth, which were originally referred by Gilmore to ''Chirostenotes pergracilis''. Now that it is known that ''Chirostenotes'' was a toothless oviraptorosaur, the jaws have been renamed ''Richardoestesia'' and are from an otherwise unknown dinosaur, likely a dromaeosaurid.〔Currie, P.J., Rigby, Jr., J.K., and Sloan, R.E. (1990). Theropod teeth from the Judith River Formation of southern Alberta, Canada. In: Carpenter, K., and Currie, P.J. (eds.). ''Dinosaur Systematics: Perspectives and Approaches''. Cambridge University Press:Cambridge, 107-125. ISBN 0-521-36672-0.〕 ''Chirostenotes'' was but the first name assigned. Feet were then found, specimen CMN 8538, and in 1932 Charles Mortram Sternberg gave them the name ''Macrophalangia canadensis'', meaning 'large toes from Canada'.〔Sternberg, C.M. (1932). Two new theropod dinosaurs from the Belly River Formation of Alberta. ''Canadian Field-Naturalist'' 46(5):99-105.〕 Sternberg correctly recognized them as part of a meat-eating dinosaur but thought they belonged to an ornithomimid. In 1936, its lower jaws, specimen CMN 8776, were found by Raymond Sternberg near Steveville and in 1940 he gave them the name ''Caenagnathus collinsi''. The generic name means 'recent jaw' from Greek ''kainos'', "new", and ''gnathos'', "jaw"; the specific name honours William Henry Collins. The toothless jaws were first thought to be those of a bird.〔Sternberg, R.M. (1940). A toothless bird from the Cretaceous of Alberta. ''Journal of Paleontology'' 14(1):81-85.〕 Slowly the precise relationship between the finds became clear. In 1960 Alexander Wetmore concluded that ''Caenagnathus'' was not a bird but an ornithomimid.〔Wetmore, A. 1960. ''A classification for the birds of the world''. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 139 (11): 1–37〕 In 1969 Edwin Colbert and Dale Russell suggested that ''Chirostenotes'' and ''Macrophalangia'' were one and the same animal.〔E.H. Colbert and D.A. Russell, 1969, "The small Cretaceous dinosaur ''Dromaeosaurus''", ''Amer. Mus. Novit.'', No. 2380, pp. 1-49〕 In 1976 Halszka Osmólska described ''Caenagnathus'' as an oviraptosaurian.〔Osmólska, H. 1976. "New light on the skull anatomy and systematic position of ''Oviraptor''". ''Nature'' 262: 683–684〕 In 1981 the announcement of ''Elmisaurus'', an Asian form of which both hand and feet had been preserved, showed the soundness of Colbert and Russell's conjecture. In 1988, a specimen from storage since 1923 was discovered and studied by Philip J. Currie and Dale Russell. This fossil helped link the other discoveries into a single dinosaur. Since the first name applied to any of these remains was ''Chirostenotes'', this were the only name that was recognized as valid.〔Currie, P.J., and Russell, D.A. (1988). Osteology and relationships of ''Chirostenotes pergracilis'' (Saurischia, Theropoda) from the Judith River (Oldman) Formation of Alberta, Canada. ''Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences'' 25:972-986.〕 Currie and Russell also addressed the complicating issue of a possible second form being present in the material. In 1933 William Arthur Parks had named ''Ornithomimus elegans'', based on specimen ROM 781, another foot from Alberta.〔Parks, W.A. (1933). New species of dinosaurs and turtles from the Upper Cretaceous formations of Alberta. ''University of Toronto Studies, Geological Series'' 34:1-33.〕 In 1971, Joël Cracraft, still under the assumption ''Caenagnathus'' was a bird, had named a second species of ''Caenagnathus'': ''Caenagnathus sternbergi'', based on specimen CMN 2690, a small lower jaw. In 1988 Russell and Currie concluded that these fossils might present a more gracile morph of ''Chirostenotes pergracilis''. In 1989 however, Currie thought that they represented a separate smaller species, and named this as a second species of the closely related ''Elmisaurus'': ''Elmisaurus elegans''.〔Currie, P.J. (1989). The first records of ''Elmisaurus'' (Saurischia, Theropoda) from North America. ''Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences'' 26(6):1319-1324.〕 In 1997, this was renamed to ''Chirostenotes elegans'' by Hans-Dieter Sues.〔Sues, H.D., 1997, "On ''Chirostenotes'', a Late Cretaceous oviraptorosaur (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from Western North America", ''Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology'' 17(4): 698-716〕 The species was moved to the new genus ''Leptorhynchos'' in 2013. Several larger skeletons from the early Maastrichtian Horseshoe Canyon Formation of Alberta and the late Maastrichtian Hell Creek Formation of Montana and South Dakota have been referred to ''Chirostenotes'' in the past, though more recent studies concluded that they represent several new species. The Horseshore Canyon formation specimen was renamed ''Epichirostenotes'' in 2011, while the Hell Creek Formation specimens have been referred to the genus ''Anzu''. In 2007 a cladistic study by Philip Senter cast doubt on the idea that all of the large Dinosaur Park Formation fossils belonged to the same creature. Coding the original hand and jaw specimens separately showed that while the ''Caenagnathus'' holotype remained in the more basal position in the Caenagnathidae commonly assigned to it, the ''Chirostenotes pergracilis'' holotype was placed as an advanced oviraptorosaurian and an oviraptorid.〔Senter, P. 2007. "A new look at the phylogeny of Coelurosauria (Dinosauria: Theropoda)". ''Journal of Systematic Palaeontology'' 5: 429-463〕〔Holtz, Thomas R. Jr. (2010) ''Dinosaurs: The Most Complete, Up-to-Date Encyclopedia for Dinosaur Lovers of All Ages,'' (Winter 2010 Appendix. )〕 Subsequent studies found that the ''Caenagnathus'' jaws did in fact group together with other traditional caenagnathids, but not necessarily ''Chirostenotes''.〔 The cladogram below follows an analysis by Longrich et al. in 2013, and shows ''Elmisaurus'' within Caenagnathidae. }} }} }} }} }} 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Chirostenotes」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|