翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Cross-cutting cleavage ・ Cross-cutting concern ・ Cross-Cutting Programs Committee ・ Cross-cutting relationships ・ Cross-deck (naval terminology) ・ Cross-docking ・ Cross-domain interoperability ・ Cross-domain solution ・ Cross-dominance ・ Cross-dressing ・ Cross-dressing in film and television ・ Cross-dressing in literature ・ Cross-dressing, gender identity, and sexuality of Joan of Arc ・ Cross-drive steering transmission ・ Cross-entropy method ・ Cross-examination ・ Cross-Eyed Mary ・ Cross-field head ・ Cross-figure ・ Cross-filing ・ Cross-flow filtration ・ Cross-flow turbine ・ Cross-fostering ・ Cross-functional team ・ Cross-gender acting ・ Cross-genre ・ Cross-Harbor Rail Tunnel ・ Cross-Harbour Bus Route 112 ・ Cross-Harbour Bus Route 606 ・ Cross-Harbour Tunnel Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Cross-examination ： ウィキペディア英語版 In law, cross-examination is the interrogation of a witness called by one's opponent. It is preceded by direct examination (in the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, South Africa, India and Pakistan known as examination-in-chief) and may be followed by a redirect (re-examination in England, Scotland, Australia, Canada, South Africa, India, Hong Kong, and Pakistan).== Variations by jurisdiction ==In the United States federal courts, a cross-examining attorney is typically not permitted to ask questions that do not pertain to the testimony offered during direct examination, but most state courts do permit a lawyer to cross-examine a witness on matters not raised during direct examination. Similarly, courts in England, Australia, and Canada allow a cross-examiner to exceed the scope of direct examination.Since a witness called by the opposing party is presumed to be hostile, cross-examination does permit leading questions. A witness called by the direct examiner, on the other hand, may only be treated as hostile by that examiner after being permitted to do so by the judge, at the request of that examiner and as a result of the witness being openly antagonistic and/or prejudiced against the opposing party.Ehrhardt, Charles W. and Stephanie J. Young, ("Using Leading Questions During Direct Examination" ), Florida State University Law Review, 1996. Accessed November 26, 2008. In law, cross-examination is the interrogation of a witness called by one's opponent. It is preceded by direct examination (in the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, South Africa, India and Pakistan known as examination-in-chief) and may be followed by a redirect (re-examination in England, Scotland, Australia, Canada, South Africa, India, Hong Kong, and Pakistan). == Variations by jurisdiction == In the United States federal courts, a cross-examining attorney is typically not permitted to ask questions that do not pertain to the testimony offered during direct examination, but most state courts do permit a lawyer to cross-examine a witness on matters not raised during direct examination. Similarly, courts in England, Australia, and Canada allow a cross-examiner to exceed the scope of direct examination. Since a witness called by the opposing party is presumed to be hostile, cross-examination does permit leading questions. A witness called by the direct examiner, on the other hand, may only be treated as hostile by that examiner after being permitted to do so by the judge, at the request of that examiner and as a result of the witness being openly antagonistic and/or prejudiced against the opposing party.〔Ehrhardt, Charles W. and Stephanie J. Young, ("Using Leading Questions During Direct Examination" ), Florida State University Law Review, 1996. Accessed November 26, 2008.〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「In law, cross-examination is the interrogation of a witness called by one's opponent. It is preceded by direct examination (in the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, South Africa, India and Pakistan known as examination-in-chief) and may be followed by a redirect (re-examination in England, Scotland, Australia, Canada, South Africa, India, Hong Kong, and Pakistan).== Variations by jurisdiction ==In the United States federal courts, a cross-examining attorney is typically not permitted to ask questions that do not pertain to the testimony offered during direct examination, but most state courts do permit a lawyer to cross-examine a witness on matters not raised during direct examination. Similarly, courts in England, Australia, and Canada allow a cross-examiner to exceed the scope of direct examination.Since a witness called by the opposing party is presumed to be hostile, cross-examination does permit leading questions. A witness called by the direct examiner, on the other hand, may only be treated as hostile by that examiner after being permitted to do so by the judge, at the request of that examiner and as a result of the witness being openly antagonistic and/or prejudiced against the opposing party.Ehrhardt, Charles W. and Stephanie J. Young, ("Using Leading Questions During Direct Examination" ), Florida State University Law Review, 1996. Accessed November 26, 2008.」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.