翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Cunene Province
・ Cunene River
・ Cuneo
・ Cuneo (surname)
・ Cuneo family
・ Cuneo Gilbert & LaDuca, LLP
・ Cuneo International Airport
・ Cuneo Museum
・ Cuneo railway station
・ Cuneo, California
・ Cuneocuboid ligament
・ Cumulative sentence
・ Cumulative song
・ Cumulative tale
・ Cumulative voting
Cumulativity
・ Cumulene
・ Cumulet
・ Cumulina
・ Cumulonimbus calvus
・ Cumulonimbus capillatus
・ Cumulonimbus cloud
・ Cumulonimbus incus
・ Cumulonimbus velum
・ Cumulopuntia
・ Cumulus (disambiguation)
・ Cumulus (software)
・ Cumulus castellanus cloud
・ Cumulus cloud
・ Cumulus congestus cloud


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Cumulativity : ウィキペディア英語版
Cumulativity
In linguistic semantics, an expression X is said to have cumulative reference if and only if the following holds: If X is true of both of ''a'' and ''b'', then it is also true of the combination of ''a'' and ''b''. Example: If two separate entities can be said to be "water", then combining them into one entity will yield more "water". If two separate entities can be said to be "a house", their combination cannot be said to be "a house". Hence, "water" has cumulative reference, while the expression "a house" does not. The plural form "houses", however, ''does'' have cumulative reference. If two (groups of) entities are both "houses", then their combination will still be "houses".
Cumulativity has proven relevant to the linguistic treatment of the mass/count distinction and for the characterization of grammatical telicity.
Formally, a cumulativity predicate ''CUM'' can be defined as follows, where capital ''X'' is a variable over sets, ''U'' is the universe of discourse, ''p'' is a mereological part structure on ''U'', and \oplus_p is the mereological sum operation.

(\forall X\subseteq U_p)(CUM(X)\iff \exists x,y(X(x) \wedge X(y) \wedge x\neq y) \wedge \forall x,y(X(x) \wedge X(y) \Rightarrow X(x \oplus_p y)))

In later work, Krifka has generalized the notion to ''n''-ary predicates, based on the phenomenon of ''cumulative quantification''. For example, the two following sentences appear to be equivalent:
: John ate an apple and Mary ate a pear.
: John and Mary ate an apple and a pear.
This shows that the relation "eat" is cumulative. In general, an ''n''-ary predicate ''R'' is ''cumulative'' if and only if the following holds:


(\forall x_1,\ldots, x_n, y_1,\ldots, y_n)(R(x_1, \ldots,x_n)\wedge R(y_1, \ldots,y_n)) \rightarrow R(x_1\oplus y_1, \ldots,x_n\oplus y_n)


==References==

Krifka, Manfred (1989). "Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics".
In Renate Bartsch, Johan van Benthem and Peter van Emde Boas (eds.), ''Semantics and Contextual Expressions'' 75-115. Dordrecht: Foris.
Krifka, Manfred. 1999. "At least some determiners aren’t determiners". In ''The semantics/pragmatics interface from different points of view'', ed. K. Turner, 257–291. North-Holland: Elsevier Science.
Scha, Remko. 1981. "Distributive, collective, and cumulative quantification". In ''Formal methods in the study of language'', ed. T. Janssen and M. Stokhof, 483–512. Amsterdam: Mathematical Centre Tracts.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Cumulativity」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.