翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Famalicão (Nazaré)
・ Famara Diedhiou
・ Famara Jatta
・ Famarin
・ FAMARS
・ Famars
・ FAMARS Rombo
・ FAMAS
・ FAMAS (disambiguation)
・ FAMAS Award
・ Falvey
・ Falvy
・ Falwel
・ Falwell
・ Falwell Airport
Falx
・ Falx (disambiguation)
・ Falx cerebelli
・ Falx cerebri
・ Falyonsky
・ Falyonsky District
・ Falz
・ Falzarego
・ Falzarego Pass
・ Falzon
・ Falán
・ Faléa
・ Falémé
・ Falémé mine
・ Falémé River


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Falx : ウィキペディア英語版
Falx

Falx is a Latin word originally meaning sickle but was later used to mean any of a number of tools that had a curved blade that was sharp on the inside edge such as a scythe. Falx was also used to mean a weapon – particularly that of the Thracians and Dacians – and, later, a siege hook used by the Romans themselves.
== Dacian falx ==

In Latin texts, the weapon was described as an ''ensis falcatus'' (whence falcata) by Ovid in ''Metamorphose'' and as a ''falx supina'' by Juvenal in Satiriae.
The Dacian falx came in two sizes: one-handed and two-handed. The shorter variant was called ''sica''〔Rome's Enemies (1): Germanics and Dacians (Men at Arms Series, 129) by Peter Wilcox and Gerry Embleton, 1982, page 35〕 (sickle) in the Dacian language (Valerius Maximus, III,2.12) with a blade length that varied but was usually around long with a handle 1/3 longer than the blade. The two-handed falx was a pole-arm. It consisted of a long wooden shaft with a long curved iron blade of nearly-equal length attached to the end. Archaeological evidence indicates that the one-handed falx was also used two-handed.〔Michael Schmitz ''The Dacian threat, 101-106 AD'' Caeros 2005 Pg 31 ISBN 0-9758445-0-4〕
The blade was sharpened only on the inside and was reputed to be devastatingly effective. However, it left its user vulnerable because, being a two-handed weapon, the warrior could not also make use of a shield. It may be imagined that the length of the two-handed falx allowed it to be wielded with great force, the point piercing helmets and the blade splitting shields - it was said to be capable of splitting a shield in two at a single blow. Alternatively, it might be used as a hook, pulling away shields and cutting at vulnerable limbs, or striking the edge of a strong shield. The inward curving point was still able to pierce the armor or flesh of the target behind the shield, rendering even the most reinforced shields much less effective defensively against a falx wielder.
Trajan's column is a monument to the emperor’s conquest of Dacia. The massive base is covered with reliefs of trophies of Dacian weapons and includes several illustrations of the two-handed falx. The column itself has a helical frieze that tells the story of the Dacian wars. On the frieze, almost all the Dacians that are armed have shields and therefore cannot be using a two-handed falx. Unfortunately, the exact weapon of those few shown without shields cannot be determined with certainty. The frieze of Trajan's column also shows Dacians using a smaller, sword-sized falx. However, this column is also largely stylized, with the sculptor believed to have worked from Trajan's now lost commentary and unlikely to have witnessed the events himself. A further problem is that most of the weapons on the monument were made of metal, which have since disappeared.〔Michael Schmitz ''The Dacian threat, 101-106 AD'' Pg 4〕
The Adamclisi monument, built by Trajan to commemorate the Romans who lost their lives in the Dacian counterattack in Moesia, is thought to have been constructed by the soldiers who fought there, so it may be more accurate. This column shows four distinct types of falx, whereas Trajan's shows only one type that does not resemble any on the Adamclisi monument. Because of this, historians disagree on which depiction is correct, but it has been pointed out that if the Trajan's column falx is correct, then there would have been no need to modify Roman armour.〔Michael Schmitz ''The Dacian threat, 101-106 AD'' Pg 30〕 Both columns show the Dacians fighting with no armour apart from a shield, although some on the Adamclisi are wearing helmets. Some historians believe that armour was not depicted to differentiate Dacians from Romans, as both used the same style shield. Other sources indicate that Dacians by this time had undergone Romanisation, used Roman military tactics, and sometimes wore Roman style scale armour. It is likely that the nobles at least wore armour and, combined with the falx, the Dacians would have been a formidable threat.〔Michael Schmitz ''The Dacian threat, 101-106 AD'' Pg 32 - 33〕

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Falx」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.