翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ "O" Is for Outlaw ・ "O"-Jung.Ban.Hap. ・ "Ode-to-Napoleon" hexachord ・ "Oh Yeah!" Live ・ "Our Contemporary" regional art exhibition (Leningrad, 1975) ・ "P" Is for Peril ・ "Pimpernel" Smith ・ "Polish death camp" controversy ・ "Pro knigi" ("About books") ・ "Prosopa" Greek Television Awards ・ "Pussy Cats" Starring the Walkmen ・ "Q" Is for Quarry ・ "R" Is for Ricochet ・ "R" The King (2016 film) ・ "Rags" Ragland ・ ! (album) ・ ! (disambiguation) ・ !! ・ !!! ・ !!! (album) ・ !!Destroy-Oh-Boy!! ・ !Action Pact! ・ !Arriba! La Pachanga ・ !Hero ・ !Hero (album) ・ !Kung language ・ !Oka Tokat ・ !PAUS3 ・ !T.O.O.H.! ・ !Women Art Revolution Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Kruskal–Wallis ： ウィキペディア英語版 Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance The Kruskal–Wallis test by ranks, Kruskal–Wallis H test〔(Kruskal-Wallis H Test using SPSS Statistics ), Laerd Statistics〕 (named after William Kruskal and W. Allen Wallis), or One-way ANOVA on ranks is a non-parametric method for testing whether samples originate from the same distribution. It is used for comparing two or more independent samples of equal or different sample sizes. It extends the Mann–Whitney U test when there are more than two groups. The parametric equivalent of the Kruskal-Wallis test is the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). A significant Kruskal-Wallis test indicates that at least one sample stochastically dominates one other sample. The test does not identify where this stochastic dominance occurs or for how many pairs of groups stochastic dominance obtains. Dunn's test would help analyze the specific sample pairs for stochastic dominance. Since it is a non-parametric method, the Kruskal–Wallis test does not assume a normal distribution of the residuals, unlike the analogous one-way analysis of variance. If the researcher can make the less stringent assumptions of an identically shaped and scaled distribution for all groups, except for any difference in medians, then the null hypothesis is that the medians of all groups are equal, and the alternative hypothesis is that at least one population median of one group is different from the population median of at least one other group. ==Method== # Rank all data from all groups together; i.e., rank the data from 1 to ''N'' ignoring group membership. Assign any tied values the average of the ranks they would have received had they not been tied. # The test statistic is given by: #:$H\; =\; (N-1)\backslash frac\_\; -\; \backslash bar)^2\}^(r\_\; -\; \backslash bar)^2\},$ where: # *$n\_i$ is the number of observations in group $i$ # *$r\_$ is the rank (among all observations) of observation $j$ from group $i$ # *$N$ is the total number of observations across all groups # *$\backslash bar\_\; =\; \backslash frac$, # *$\backslash bar\; =\backslash tfrac\; 12\; (N+1)$ is the average of all the $r\_$. # If the data contain no ties the denominator of the expression for $H$ is exactly $(N-1)N(N+1)/12$ and $\backslash bar=\backslash tfrac$. Thus #:$$ \begin H & = \frac\sum_^g n_i \left(\bar_ - \frac\right)^2 \\ & = \frac\sum_^g n_i \bar_^2 -\ 3(N+1). \end The last formula only contains the squares of the average ranks. # A correction for ties if using the short-cut formula described in the previous point can be made by dividing $H$ by $1\; -\; \backslash frac$, where ''G'' is the number of groupings of different tied ranks, and ''t''''i'' is the number of tied values within group ''i'' that are tied at a particular value. This correction usually makes little difference in the value of H unless there are a large number of ties. # Finally, the p-value is approximated by $\backslash Pr(\backslash chi^2\_\; \backslash ge\; H)$. If some $n\_i$ values are small (i.e., less than 5) the probability distribution of H can be quite different from this chi-squared distribution. If a table of the chi-squared probability distribution is available, the critical value of chi-squared, $\backslash chi^2\_$, can be found by entering the table at ''g'' − 1 degrees of freedom and looking under the desired significance or alpha level. # If the statistic is not significant, then there is no evidence of stochastic dominance between the samples. However, if the test is significant then at least one sample stochastically dominates another sample. Therefore, a researcher might use sample contrasts between individual sample pairs, or ''post hoc'' tests using Dunn's test, which (1) properly employs the same rankings as the Kruskal-Wallis test, and (2) properly employs the pooled variance implied by the null hypothesis of the Kruskal-Wallis test in order to determine which of the sample pairs are significantly different.〔 When performing multiple sample contrasts or tests, the Type I error rate tends to become inflated, raising concerns about multiple comparisons. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.