|
:''Ramist redirects here. It may also refer to followers of the composer Jean-Philippe Rameau.'' Ramism was a collection of theories on rhetoric, logic and pedagogy based on the teachings of Petrus Ramus, a French academic, philosopher and Huguenot convert who was murdered in 1572 during the St. Bartholomew's Day massacre in August. According to Jonathan Israel, Ramism ==Development== Audomarus Talaeus (Omer Talon) was an early French disciple and writer on Ramism.〔(Virginia.edu )〕 The work of Ramus gained early international attention, with Roger Ascham corresponding about him with Johann Sturm, teacher of Ramus and collaborator with Ascham; Ascham supported his stance on Joachim Perion, one early opponent, but also expressed some reservations. Later Ascham found Ramus's lack of respect for Cicero, rather than extreme proponents, just unacceptable.〔Lawrence V. Ryan, ''Roger Ascham'' (1963), pp. 147–8, p. 269.〕 After Ramus died, his ideas had influence in some (but not all) parts of Protestant Europe. His influence was strong in Germany and the Netherlands, and on Puritan and Calvinist theologians of England, Scotland, and New England. He had little effect on mainstream Swiss Calvinists, and was largely ignored in Catholic countries.〔''Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy'' (1988), pp. 51–52.〕 The progress of Ramism in the half-century roughly 1575 to 1625 was closely related to, and mediated by, university education: the religious factor came in through the different reception in Protestant and Catholic universities, all over Europe.〔Bryan S. Turner, ''Max Weber: Critical Responses'' (1999), p. 198.〕 The works of Ramus reached New England on the ''Mayflower''.〔Robert Mandrou, ''From Humanism to Science 1480–1700'' (1978 translation), p. 177.〕 Ramus was killed in 1572, and a biography by Banosius (Théophile de Banos) appeared by 1576.〔With the posthumous ''Commentariorum de religione Christiana libri quatuor, nunquam antea editi'' (Frankfort, 1576); http://www.ccel.org/s/schaff/encyc/encyc09/htm/iv.vii.xxxiv.htm.〕 His status as Huguenot martyr certainly had something to do with the early dissemination of his ideas.〔 Kees Meerhoff, ''Rhétorique et poétique au XVIe siècle en France: Du Bellay, Ramus et les autres'' (1986), p. 317.〕 Outside France, for example, there was the 1574 English translation by the Scot Roland MacIlmaine of the University of St Andrews.〔(LLGC.org.uk )〕〔William Kneale and Martha Kneale, ''The Development of Logic'' (1962), p. 302.〕 Ramus's works and influence then appeared in the logical textbooks of the Scottish universities, and equally he had followers in England. As late as 1626 Francis Burgersdyk divides the logicians of his day into the Aristotelians, the Ramists and the Semi-Ramists.〔Michael Losonsky, ''Language and Logic'', in Donald Rutherford (editor), ''The Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Philosophy'' (2006), p. 170.〕〔William Kneale and Martha Kneale, ''The Development of Logic'' (1962), p. 305.〕 These last endeavoured, like Rudolph Goclenius of Marburg and Amandus Polanus of Basel, to mediate between the contending parties. Ramism was closely linked to systematic Calvinism, but the hybrid Philippo-Ramism (which is where the Semi-Ramists fit in) arose as a blend of Ramus with the logic of Philipp Melanchthon.〔Michael Losonsky, ''Language and Logic'', in Donald Rutherford (editor), ''The Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Philosophy'' (2006), p. 178.〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「:''Ramist redirects here. It may also refer to followers of the composer Jean-Philippe Rameau.'''''Ramism''' was a collection of theories on rhetoric, logic and pedagogy based on the teachings of Petrus Ramus, a French academic, philosopher and Huguenot convert who was murdered in 1572 during the St. Bartholomew's Day massacre in August.According to Jonathan Israel, Ramism==Development==Audomarus Talaeus (Omer Talon) was an early French disciple and writer on Ramism.(Virginia.edu ) The work of Ramus gained early international attention, with Roger Ascham corresponding about him with Johann Sturm, teacher of Ramus and collaborator with Ascham; Ascham supported his stance on Joachim Perion, one early opponent, but also expressed some reservations. Later Ascham found Ramus's lack of respect for Cicero, rather than extreme proponents, just unacceptable.Lawrence V. Ryan, ''Roger Ascham'' (1963), pp. 147–8, p. 269.After Ramus died, his ideas had influence in some (but not all) parts of Protestant Europe. His influence was strong in Germany and the Netherlands, and on Puritan and Calvinist theologians of England, Scotland, and New England. He had little effect on mainstream Swiss Calvinists, and was largely ignored in Catholic countries.''Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy'' (1988), pp. 51–52. The progress of Ramism in the half-century roughly 1575 to 1625 was closely related to, and mediated by, university education: the religious factor came in through the different reception in Protestant and Catholic universities, all over Europe.Bryan S. Turner, ''Max Weber: Critical Responses'' (1999), p. 198. The works of Ramus reached New England on the ''Mayflower''.Robert Mandrou, ''From Humanism to Science 1480–1700'' (1978 translation), p. 177.Ramus was killed in 1572, and a biography by Banosius (Théophile de Banos) appeared by 1576.With the posthumous ''Commentariorum de religione Christiana libri quatuor, nunquam antea editi'' (Frankfort, 1576); http://www.ccel.org/s/schaff/encyc/encyc09/htm/iv.vii.xxxiv.htm. His status as Huguenot martyr certainly had something to do with the early dissemination of his ideas. Kees Meerhoff, ''Rhétorique et poétique au XVIe siècle en France: Du Bellay, Ramus et les autres'' (1986), p. 317. Outside France, for example, there was the 1574 English translation by the Scot Roland MacIlmaine of the University of St Andrews.(LLGC.org.uk )William Kneale and Martha Kneale, ''The Development of Logic'' (1962), p. 302. Ramus's works and influence then appeared in the logical textbooks of the Scottish universities, and equally he had followers in England.As late as 1626 Francis Burgersdyk divides the logicians of his day into the Aristotelians, the Ramists and the Semi-Ramists.Michael Losonsky, ''Language and Logic'', in Donald Rutherford (editor), ''The Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Philosophy'' (2006), p. 170.William Kneale and Martha Kneale, ''The Development of Logic'' (1962), p. 305. These last endeavoured, like Rudolph Goclenius of Marburg and Amandus Polanus of Basel, to mediate between the contending parties. Ramism was closely linked to systematic Calvinism, but the hybrid Philippo-Ramism (which is where the Semi-Ramists fit in) arose as a blend of Ramus with the logic of Philipp Melanchthon.Michael Losonsky, ''Language and Logic'', in Donald Rutherford (editor), ''The Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Philosophy'' (2006), p. 178.」の詳細全文を読む :''Ramist redirects here. It may also refer to followers of the composer Jean-Philippe Rameau.'' Ramism was a collection of theories on rhetoric, logic and pedagogy based on the teachings of Petrus Ramus, a French academic, philosopher and Huguenot convert who was murdered in 1572 during the St. Bartholomew's Day massacre in August. According to Jonathan Israel, Ramism ==Development== Audomarus Talaeus (Omer Talon) was an early French disciple and writer on Ramism.〔(Virginia.edu )〕 The work of Ramus gained early international attention, with Roger Ascham corresponding about him with Johann Sturm, teacher of Ramus and collaborator with Ascham; Ascham supported his stance on Joachim Perion, one early opponent, but also expressed some reservations. Later Ascham found Ramus's lack of respect for Cicero, rather than extreme proponents, just unacceptable.〔Lawrence V. Ryan, ''Roger Ascham'' (1963), pp. 147–8, p. 269.〕 After Ramus died, his ideas had influence in some (but not all) parts of Protestant Europe. His influence was strong in Germany and the Netherlands, and on Puritan and Calvinist theologians of England, Scotland, and New England. He had little effect on mainstream Swiss Calvinists, and was largely ignored in Catholic countries.〔''Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy'' (1988), pp. 51–52.〕 The progress of Ramism in the half-century roughly 1575 to 1625 was closely related to, and mediated by, university education: the religious factor came in through the different reception in Protestant and Catholic universities, all over Europe.〔Bryan S. Turner, ''Max Weber: Critical Responses'' (1999), p. 198.〕 The works of Ramus reached New England on the ''Mayflower''.〔Robert Mandrou, ''From Humanism to Science 1480–1700'' (1978 translation), p. 177.〕 Ramus was killed in 1572, and a biography by Banosius (Théophile de Banos) appeared by 1576.〔With the posthumous ''Commentariorum de religione Christiana libri quatuor, nunquam antea editi'' (Frankfort, 1576); http://www.ccel.org/s/schaff/encyc/encyc09/htm/iv.vii.xxxiv.htm.〕 His status as Huguenot martyr certainly had something to do with the early dissemination of his ideas.〔 Kees Meerhoff, ''Rhétorique et poétique au XVIe siècle en France: Du Bellay, Ramus et les autres'' (1986), p. 317.〕 Outside France, for example, there was the 1574 English translation by the Scot Roland MacIlmaine of the University of St Andrews.〔(LLGC.org.uk )〕〔William Kneale and Martha Kneale, ''The Development of Logic'' (1962), p. 302.〕 Ramus's works and influence then appeared in the logical textbooks of the Scottish universities, and equally he had followers in England. As late as 1626 Francis Burgersdyk divides the logicians of his day into the Aristotelians, the Ramists and the Semi-Ramists.〔Michael Losonsky, ''Language and Logic'', in Donald Rutherford (editor), ''The Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Philosophy'' (2006), p. 170.〕〔William Kneale and Martha Kneale, ''The Development of Logic'' (1962), p. 305.〕 These last endeavoured, like Rudolph Goclenius of Marburg and Amandus Polanus of Basel, to mediate between the contending parties. Ramism was closely linked to systematic Calvinism, but the hybrid Philippo-Ramism (which is where the Semi-Ramists fit in) arose as a blend of Ramus with the logic of Philipp Melanchthon.〔Michael Losonsky, ''Language and Logic'', in Donald Rutherford (editor), ''The Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Philosophy'' (2006), p. 178.〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「:''Ramist redirects here. It may also refer to followers of the composer Jean-Philippe Rameau.''Ramism''' was a collection of theories on rhetoric, logic and pedagogy based on the teachings of Petrus Ramus, a French academic, philosopher and Huguenot convert who was murdered in 1572 during the St. Bartholomew's Day massacre in August.According to Jonathan Israel, Ramism==Development==Audomarus Talaeus (Omer Talon) was an early French disciple and writer on Ramism.(Virginia.edu ) The work of Ramus gained early international attention, with Roger Ascham corresponding about him with Johann Sturm, teacher of Ramus and collaborator with Ascham; Ascham supported his stance on Joachim Perion, one early opponent, but also expressed some reservations. Later Ascham found Ramus's lack of respect for Cicero, rather than extreme proponents, just unacceptable.Lawrence V. Ryan, ''Roger Ascham'' (1963), pp. 147–8, p. 269.After Ramus died, his ideas had influence in some (but not all) parts of Protestant Europe. His influence was strong in Germany and the Netherlands, and on Puritan and Calvinist theologians of England, Scotland, and New England. He had little effect on mainstream Swiss Calvinists, and was largely ignored in Catholic countries.''Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy'' (1988), pp. 51–52. The progress of Ramism in the half-century roughly 1575 to 1625 was closely related to, and mediated by, university education: the religious factor came in through the different reception in Protestant and Catholic universities, all over Europe.Bryan S. Turner, ''Max Weber: Critical Responses'' (1999), p. 198. The works of Ramus reached New England on the ''Mayflower''.Robert Mandrou, ''From Humanism to Science 1480–1700'' (1978 translation), p. 177.Ramus was killed in 1572, and a biography by Banosius (Théophile de Banos) appeared by 1576.With the posthumous ''Commentariorum de religione Christiana libri quatuor, nunquam antea editi'' (Frankfort, 1576); http://www.ccel.org/s/schaff/encyc/encyc09/htm/iv.vii.xxxiv.htm. His status as Huguenot martyr certainly had something to do with the early dissemination of his ideas. Kees Meerhoff, ''Rhétorique et poétique au XVIe siècle en France: Du Bellay, Ramus et les autres'' (1986), p. 317. Outside France, for example, there was the 1574 English translation by the Scot Roland MacIlmaine of the University of St Andrews.(LLGC.org.uk )William Kneale and Martha Kneale, ''The Development of Logic'' (1962), p. 302. Ramus's works and influence then appeared in the logical textbooks of the Scottish universities, and equally he had followers in England.As late as 1626 Francis Burgersdyk divides the logicians of his day into the Aristotelians, the Ramists and the Semi-Ramists.Michael Losonsky, ''Language and Logic'', in Donald Rutherford (editor), ''The Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Philosophy'' (2006), p. 170.William Kneale and Martha Kneale, ''The Development of Logic'' (1962), p. 305. These last endeavoured, like Rudolph Goclenius of Marburg and Amandus Polanus of Basel, to mediate between the contending parties. Ramism was closely linked to systematic Calvinism, but the hybrid Philippo-Ramism (which is where the Semi-Ramists fit in) arose as a blend of Ramus with the logic of Philipp Melanchthon.Michael Losonsky, ''Language and Logic'', in Donald Rutherford (editor), ''The Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Philosophy'' (2006), p. 178.」の詳細全文を読む ''Ramism''' was a collection of theories on rhetoric, logic and pedagogy based on the teachings of Petrus Ramus, a French academic, philosopher and Huguenot convert who was murdered in 1572 during the St. Bartholomew's Day massacre in August.According to Jonathan Israel, Ramism==Development==Audomarus Talaeus (Omer Talon) was an early French disciple and writer on Ramism.(Virginia.edu ) The work of Ramus gained early international attention, with Roger Ascham corresponding about him with Johann Sturm, teacher of Ramus and collaborator with Ascham; Ascham supported his stance on Joachim Perion, one early opponent, but also expressed some reservations. Later Ascham found Ramus's lack of respect for Cicero, rather than extreme proponents, just unacceptable.Lawrence V. Ryan, ''Roger Ascham'' (1963), pp. 147–8, p. 269.After Ramus died, his ideas had influence in some (but not all) parts of Protestant Europe. His influence was strong in Germany and the Netherlands, and on Puritan and Calvinist theologians of England, Scotland, and New England. He had little effect on mainstream Swiss Calvinists, and was largely ignored in Catholic countries.''Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy'' (1988), pp. 51–52. The progress of Ramism in the half-century roughly 1575 to 1625 was closely related to, and mediated by, university education: the religious factor came in through the different reception in Protestant and Catholic universities, all over Europe.Bryan S. Turner, ''Max Weber: Critical Responses'' (1999), p. 198. The works of Ramus reached New England on the ''Mayflower''.Robert Mandrou, ''From Humanism to Science 1480–1700'' (1978 translation), p. 177.Ramus was killed in 1572, and a biography by Banosius (Théophile de Banos) appeared by 1576.With the posthumous ''Commentariorum de religione Christiana libri quatuor, nunquam antea editi'' (Frankfort, 1576); http://www.ccel.org/s/schaff/encyc/encyc09/htm/iv.vii.xxxiv.htm. His status as Huguenot martyr certainly had something to do with the early dissemination of his ideas. Kees Meerhoff, ''Rhétorique et poétique au XVIe siècle en France: Du Bellay, Ramus et les autres'' (1986), p. 317. Outside France, for example, there was the 1574 English translation by the Scot Roland MacIlmaine of the University of St Andrews.(LLGC.org.uk )William Kneale and Martha Kneale, ''The Development of Logic'' (1962), p. 302. Ramus's works and influence then appeared in the logical textbooks of the Scottish universities, and equally he had followers in England.As late as 1626 Francis Burgersdyk divides the logicians of his day into the Aristotelians, the Ramists and the Semi-Ramists.Michael Losonsky, ''Language and Logic'', in Donald Rutherford (editor), ''The Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Philosophy'' (2006), p. 170.William Kneale and Martha Kneale, ''The Development of Logic'' (1962), p. 305. These last endeavoured, like Rudolph Goclenius of Marburg and Amandus Polanus of Basel, to mediate between the contending parties. Ramism was closely linked to systematic Calvinism, but the hybrid Philippo-Ramism (which is where the Semi-Ramists fit in) arose as a blend of Ramus with the logic of Philipp Melanchthon.Michael Losonsky, ''Language and Logic'', in Donald Rutherford (editor), ''The Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Philosophy'' (2006), p. 178.」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|