|
Wiki-Watch, formally known as Arbeitsstelle Wiki-Watch im „Studien- und Forschungsschwerpunkt Medienrecht“ der Juristischen Fakultät der Europa-Universität Viadrina (English: Wiki-Watch Project at the "Study and Research Centre on Media Law" from the Faculty of Law at Viadrina European University) is a German university project for transparency of Wikipedia and Wikipedia articles, aimed especially at media professionals. Wiki-Watch conducted and published a survey of administrators of German Wikipedia and blogs regularly about German Wikipedia problems. Wiki-Watch's site wiki-watch.org provides statistic insights on Wikipedia. Part of Wiki-Watch.org is a free software application for page analysis. This tool automatically assesses the formal reliability of Wikipedia articles in English and German. It produces a five-level evaluation score corresponding to its assessment of reliability. Second, its “Exclusive Insight” shows what is occurring in Wikipedia in nearly realtime.〔(【引用サイトリンク】 url = http://en.wiki-watch.de/index.php?Content=Portal&Detail=Home )〕 The Wiki-Watch blog spots current trends in Wikipedia and is a source of news coverage about the Wikipedia project.〔(【引用サイトリンク】 url =http://en.wiki-watch.de/index.php?Content=Presse_Pressespiegel )〕〔(【引用サイトリンク】 url =http://www.wiki-watch.de/index.php?Content=Presse_Pressespiegel )〕 Wiki-Watch was developed at the Viadrina European University in Frankfurt an der Oder, Germany. The development team included professors Wolfgang Stock and Johannes Weberling.〔 == Wiki-Watch's formal page analysis == Wiki-Watch's formal analysis relies on tracking each entry made in a Wikipedia article. It checks the number of sources, the number of editors and the number of links to the article. Within the additional implemented WikiTrust each editor is also given a "quality score" that assesses the reliability of their edits.〔 Hundreds of thousands of editors have contributed Wikipedia entries and the reliability of the information within Wikipedia has been the subject of debate among experts. Since 2009, the Wikimedia Foundation had been considering marking text that had not been reviewed or edited by multiple editors as "untested". This form of reliability checking could enhance acceptance of scholarly Wikipedia content within educational establishments. Text tracking has incorporated into the WikiTrust system, in ongoing development at the University of California Santa Cruz〔 and implemented in Wiki-Watch. Specific text fragments that have not been edited by multiple authors with a good score are flagged as potentially unreliable or unsafe.〔dpa: (''Wiki-Watch-Projekt wird fortgesetzt - Stock legt Leitung nieder'' ) of 7 September 2011.〕 The reliability and reputation scoring system uses a color code scheme to evaluate pieces of text, based on the edit history and number of revisions by users, thereby signaling what may be unreliable changes within an article. The reliability of each editor is assessed by reviewing the changes they have made to various articles, and tracking their contributions to see how well the contributions survive after edits by other editors. The page analysis is comparable to WikiBu with some differences. WikiTrust is more detailed than WikiBu. Wiki-Watch stresses more the quality of sources, while WikiBu stresses more the quantity of views over sources. Wiki-Watch is aimed at media professionals, while WikiBu is aimed on pupils and teachers. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Wiki-Watch」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|