|
Roboethics is a short expression for ethics of robotics. It is often used in the sense that it is concerned with the behavior of humans, how humans design, construct, use and treat robots and other artificially intelligent beings, whereas machine ethics is concerned with the behavior of robots themselves, whether or not they are considered artificial moral agents (AMAs). While the issue is as old as the word ''robot'', the short word roboethics was probably first used by roboticist Gianmarco Veruggio in 2002, who also served as chair of an Atelier funded by the European Robotics Research Network to outline areas where research may be needed. The road map effectively divided ethics of artificial intelligence into two sub-fields to accommodate researchers' differing interests: ==Main positions on roboethics== Since the (First International Symposium on Roboethics ) (Sanremo, Italy, 2004), three main ethical positions emerged from the robotics community (D. Cerqui, 2004): *Not interested in ethics (This is the attitude of those who consider that their actions are strictly technical, and do not think they have a social or a moral responsibility in their work) *Interested in short-term ethical questions (This is the attitude of those who express their ethical concern in terms of “good” or “bad,” and who refer to some cultural values and social conventions) *Interested in long-term ethical concerns (This is the attitude of those who express their ethical concern in terms of global, long-term questions) 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「roboethics」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|